Commonwealth v. Lezinsky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
VAN der VOORT, Judge:
Defendant was charged with, and convicted in a jury trial of three crimes, Arson, Criminal Conspiracy, and Criminal Mischief. He was sentenced to two concurrent periods of five to ten years on the Arson and Criminal Conspiracy crimes; and to a consecutive sentence of two to five years on the Criminal Mischief. His appeal raises the issue of whether he may lawfully be sentenced separately (and consecutively) for the Criminal Mischief, which arose, says the defendant, “from the same incident”, and from the commission by defendant of “but one act.”
The “act” proved against…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. LockhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Shaddock v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. BaileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Russo v. Ashe, WardenCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1928
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. MirandaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. MalloySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. VanderlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. CrockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.