Legal Opinion

Hohenberg v. Shelby County, Tennessee

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided August 3, 2022No. 2:20-cv-02432Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ) SARAH HOHENBERG AND JOSEPH ) HANSON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) v. ) No. 2:20-cv-02432-SHM-cgc ) SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE; ) DIVISION 14 OF THE SHELBY ) COUNTY, TENNESSEE, GENERAL ) SESSIONS COURT, CRIMINAL ) DIVISION; AND CITY OF ) MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER GRANTING SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DISMISSING CASE Sarah Hohenberg and Joseph Hanson (“Plaintiffs”) seek relief under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

for alleged violations of their constitutional rights. (See…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API