Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Merck Co Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 29, 2004No. 03-2616UnpublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.

This matter comes on before this court on an appeal by plaintiffs Donna M. Tucker (“Ms.Tucker”) and Troy Tucker (“Mr.Tucker”) from the district court’s order entered on May 2, 2003, granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”) on both plaintiffs’ claims of defamation and Mr. Tucker’s claim of invasion of privacy. The district court had subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Following…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kneipp v. TedderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Mark v. Borough of HatboroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Pastore v. Bell Telephone Co. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Meritcare Incorporated Meritcare Ventures, Inc. Quinlan Medical, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Klein v. Commerce Energy, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Desmond v. PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Emekekwue v. OfforDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Martin v. FinleyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Cox v. GalazinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API