Legal Opinion
United States v. Colorado & Eastern Railroad
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided May 27, 1993No. 89-C-1786PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
CARRIGAN, District Judge.
In October 1989, the United States filed suit under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. against a number of defendants, including Farmland Industries, Inc. (Farmland) and Colorado & Eastern Railroad Company (CERC) to recover the costs it incurred cleaning up the Woodbury Chemical Company Superfund Site (the site). Farmland filed claims under state and federal law against co-defendant CERC and third party defendants Great Northern Transportation Company (GNTC) and Gary W. Flanders…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Connes v. Molalla Transport System, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- United States v. Pretty Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Akzo Coatings, Incorporated, and the O'Brien Corporation v. Aigner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Colorado & Eastern Railroad Company, Farmland Industries, Inc., and Maytag Corporation, McKesson Corporation v. Gary W. Flanders Great Northern Transportation Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Raytheon Co. v. McGraw-Edison Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
- United States v. Colorado & Eastern RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Mathews v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.