Legal Opinion
United States v. Arnold
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 5, 2005No. 04-10435PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Eddie Arnold challenges his conviction of and sentencing for his participation in a methamphetamine narcotics conspiracy. Finding no error, we affirm.
I
Arnold was indicted for his alleged participation in a narcotics distribution conspiracy involving 500 grams or more of a mixture of a substance containing a defec-tible amount of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The government’s star witness was one of Arnold’s co-defendants, Clint McMillan, who testified that they had agreed to buy and sell methamphetamine for profit. McMillan stated they…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. FuchsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. ArledgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.