Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Fuchs

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 16, 2006No. 05-10426PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-appellants Clayton H. Fuchs, Eugene Gonzales, and Waldrick Lemons were charged in a six-count indictment for their involvement in two Internet-based pharmacies that dispensed controlled substances to thousands of customers without valid prescriptions. The jury convicted them on all counts, and they timely appealed. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

This case centers around two Internet-based pharmacies that defendant-appellant Clayton H. Fuchs established and operated. In 1999, Fuchs, then a licensed…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph EbronCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Carmen Denise HerediaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Norberto AlanizCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. OllisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. MunozCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API