Legal Opinion
Bluehawk v. Continental Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 1996No. B085929PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GODOY PEREZ, J.
Appellant Continental Insurance Company (Continental) appeals a judgment declaring Continental owed a duty to defend and indemnify Hans Mustad for injuries he caused to respondents Robert J. Alvarez HI, Wendy D. Alvarez, and Donovan J. Alvarez, through his guardian ad litem, Julie Ann Ibrahim (collectively the Alvarez heirs), and Tone Louise Bluehawk (Bluehawk). After review, we reverse the judgment as to Continental and affirm in all other respects.
Procedural and Factual Background
From 1988 to 1990, Hans Mustad (Hans), who was in his 20’s, lived with his mother, Fay…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Kuhn v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Federal Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Hameid v. National Fire Insurance of HartfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Ward General Insurance Services, Inc. v. Employers Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Rosen v. Nations Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- VONS COS., INC. v. US Fire Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.