Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Hartford Insurance & Aquaviva

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner insurer’s application to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim was denied on the ground that respondent insurer could disclaim coverage of the offending vehicle, it having been stolen at the time of the accident. On appeal, petitioner argues that respondent insurer’s duty to defend includes issues of the operator’s negligence, since respondent owner of the offending vehicle left it unattended in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1210 (a) (citing General Acc. Group v Noonan, 66 Misc 2d 528; Howard v Kiskiel, 152 AD2d 950). Since petitioner did not assert this theory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Szigyarto v. SzigyartoNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. General Accident Group v. NoonanNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Simon v. El Service Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Howard v. KiskielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between American Transit Insurance & BaezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Burke v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. In re Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & PittersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API