Legal Opinion

Howard v. Kiskiel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries he sustained while a passenger in an automobile owned by and stolen from defendant. Special Term properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action for common-law negligence because at common law, the owner of an automobile who leaves his keys in his car is not liable for the negligence of a thief who steals the automobile; "the use of the car by the thief intervened between the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berk v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Beck v. GobyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Zwerdling v. GillisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phifer v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re the Arbitration between Hartford Insurance & AquavivaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API