Legal Opinion

East Ohio Gas Co. v. James Bros. Coal Co.

Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 29, 1948PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By LAMNECK, J.

The plaintiff corporation in this case seeks to enjoin the ■defendant corporation from taking any action or conducting any mining operations on certain land described in the petition which will in any manner interfere with or damage certain gas pipe lines and a telephone line of the plaintiff or interfere with the operation thereof running across said lands.

*439The defendant’s predecessors in title to the land in question granted to the plaintiff a right of way over the lands in question to lay, maintain, operate, and remove pipe lines for the-transportation of oil or gas and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jilek v. Chicago, Wilmington & Franklin Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Quinn v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Southern Pacific Railroad v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. Keystone Lime Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Consumers Gas Trust Co. v. American Plate Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Crane Hollow, Inc. v. Marathon Ashland Pipe Line, LLCOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. San Jacinto Sand Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Rueckel v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Vandiver v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1963
  5. Ohio Fuel Gas Co. v. Sun Oil Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API