Kelso Enterprises, Ltd. v. M/V WISIDA FROST
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO ENGLISH FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE IN BILLS OF LADING
COLLINS, District Judge.
After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
I. Background
A. Procedural History
On July 24, 1997, Plaintiff KELSO ENTERPRISES, LTD. (“Kelso”) filed a Complaint against M/V WISIDA FROST, her engines, boilers etc. (“the Vessel”) in rem; MASTER OF THE M/V WISIDA FROST; WISSEL II., LTD., a business entity (“Wis-sel II”), and REDERIAKTIEBOLAGET GUSTAF ERIKSON, a business entity, in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Comerica Bank v. Whitehall Specialties, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2004
- Ioannidis/Riga v. M/V SEA CONCERTDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2001
- Nymet Industrial Solutions, Inc. v. Maersk, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Prospero Tire Export, Inc. v. Maersk Line, LtdDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Expeditors International of Washington IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022