Buckstaff Bath House Co. v. McKinley
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Section 901 of the Social Security Act (49 Stat. 620) levies an excise tax, equal to specified percentages of total wages paid, on “every employer” of eight or more persons with respect to their “employment.” By § 902 the taxpayer may credit against this tax the amount of contributions paid by him into an unemployment fund under a state law* such credit however not to exceed 90 percent of the tax and to be allowed only for contributions made *360under the laws of states approved and certified by the Social Security Board in accordance with the standards .prescribed in § 903. By § 907 the term…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Arlington Hotel Co. v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Penn Dairies, Inc. v. Milk Control Comm'n of Pa.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Standard Dredging Corp. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.