Capital Credit & Collection Serv., Inc. v. Kerr Contractors, Inc.

*488In this breach of contract action, the trial court granted summary judgment in *317favor of plaintiff, and defendant1 appeals the resulting judgment. Defendant contends that the contract at issue is ambiguous as a matter of law, that it must be construed against plaintiff because it is an insurance contract, and that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. We conclude that the contract is unambiguous and that the trial court did not err. Accordingly, we affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists for trial and the moving…