United States v. Clifton
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1ConcurrenceErdmann, Judge
I concur with the majority’s analysis and resolution of the substantive issue and write only to express my view of the waiver issue. The majority deals with waiver by holding that “we need not reach the issue of waiver because, even assuming that Appellant merely forfeited the issue, we conclude that he failed to carry his burden to show prejudice under a plain error analysis.” United States v. Clifton, 71 M.J. 489, 491 (C.A.A.F.2013). However, I believe the issue of waiver must be addressed because, if there was a waiver, there is nothing for an appellate court to consider. United States v.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. CamposCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.