Leflore v. Steen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, C.
The plaintiff in error was plaintiff and defendants in error were defendants in the trial court, and for brevity they will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff brought suit against the defendants for possession of the S. AAT. lA of-section 14, T. 6 S., R. 13 E., in Choctaw county, for rents -and profits and damages,, and to cancel a guardian’s deed to defendant Phillips, and deed from Phillips to defendant Steen, and mortgages from Steen to defendants Holmes & Son, and to quiet title.
As grounds for the action, plaintiff alleged that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- McNitt v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Pryor v. DowneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Eaves v. MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Welch v. FochtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tittle v. RobbersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Thomas v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930