Legal Opinion

Bierman v. Limoncelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 18, 2013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to set aside an agreement, stipulations of discontinuance, and a deed executed pursuant to said agreement, and for the return of an engagement ring, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Feinman, J.), entered July 24, 2012, as granted those branches of the defendant’s motion which were to dismiss the complaint and vacate a notice of pendency and, sua sponte, imposed a sanction against him in the sum of $1,000, and the defendant cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied those branches…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Corsello v. Verizon New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Samiento v. World Yacht Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Roney v. JanisNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 249-251 Brighton Beach Ave., LLC v. 249 Brighton Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API