Legal Opinion

Bandy v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

The defendant was convicted of violating the provisions of Chapter 114 of the Private Acts of 1935 and given a fine. He has appealed in error here.

The Act referred to applies to Sullivan County and fixes civil and criminal penalties against any county official of that county who shall expend more in the discharge of his office than the amount provided for in a budget adopted by the quarterly county court.

The learned assistant attorney general states the following in his brief:

“ . . . The writer of this brief is convinced of the unconstitutionality of Ch. 114, Private Acts of 1935, but since…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ByrneTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Darnell v. ShapardTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor Theater, Inc. v. Town of Mountain CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State Ex Rel. Brooks v. EblenTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. ChurchillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Pierce v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API