Legal Opinion

Halperson v. Halperson

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 9, 2006No. 05-P-490Published

1Opinion of the Court

A judge of the Probate and Family Court ordered the question of the validity of the parties’ antenuptial agreement bifurcated from the remainder of the divorce action. After a brief trial on the antenuptial agreement, a different judge of that court ruled that the antenuptial agreement was invalid, and a “judgment” entered to that effect. The remaining issues of the parties’ divorce are still pending. The husband’s appeal from the judge’s interlocutory ruling on the validity of the antenuptial agreement accordingly is not properly before us, and we remand the matter to the Probate and Family…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Long v. WickettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  2. Mancuso v. MancusoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. Pistorino & Co. v. Style Leather Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. McDonnell v. McDonnellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API