Pistorino & Co. v. Style Leather Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.
The plaintiff (Pistorino), a licensed cus*465tomhouse broker in Bostón, seeks declaratory relief concerning its right to reimbursement by the defendant (Style), a leather importer in Haverhill, for about $35,000 of additional import duties owed on Style’s account (and liquidated by Pistorino after the initiation of this suit) on goods brought into the United States by Style.1 A Superior Court judge overruled Style’s demurrer and, after hearing, caused a final decree to be entered, declaring that Style must pay to Pistorino $35,169.86 with interest. Style appealed. The facts are stated largely on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Union Brokerage Co. v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- School Committee of Cambridge v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Nissenberg v. FellemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Berenson v. NirensteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Batista v. NicollsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Command Communications, Inc. v. Fritz CompaniesColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Langton v. Secretary of Public SafetyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Lagasse v. LagasseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Halperson v. HalpersonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Kent v. Board of HealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974