Legal Opinion

In re Hubscher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Inattention to tbe affairs of a client led to tbe filing of a complaint against respondent witb petitioner’s Committee on Grievances. All of tbe frequent efforts of tbe committee to obtain a response to tbe complaint were frustrated by respondent’s delays and evasions, wbicb.went to tbe extent of twice ignoring tbe process of tbis court requiring bis appearance before tbe committee. Tbe record reveals no adequate excuse for respondent’s disregard of tbe committee’s endeavor to investigate tbe complaint against bim, and we agree witb petitioner’s submission that such conduct cannot be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of DolphinNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. In re BranchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. In re WardeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API