Legal Opinion

Kellon v. Cleveland Marshall College of Law

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1995No. 67941Published

1Per curiam

An accelerated appeal is authorized pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and Loc.R. 25. The purpose of an accelerated docket is to allow an appellate court to render a brief and conclusive decision. Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn. (1983), 11 Ohio App.3d. 158, 11 OBR 240, 463 N.E.2d 655; App.R. 11.1(E).

Plaintiff-appellant Constance Kellon appeals the trial court’s decision granting the Civ.R. 12(B)(1) motion to dismiss filed by the defendants-appellees Cleveland Marshall College of Law, Dean Steven R. Smith, Assistant Dean Jean B. Lifter and Associate Professor Lloyd B. Snyder. The appellant, a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. York v. Ohio State Highway PatrolOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API