Legal Opinion

State v. Block Iron & Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 30, 1994No. 93-0222PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.

The question presented in this case is whether the State may seek civil forfeitures under § 147.21, STATS., from a business after issuing an administrative order pursuant to § 144.76(7)(c), Stats., requiring the business to remediate pollution it caused. Sadoff & Rudoy Industries contends that § 144.76(ll)(b), which prohibits the State from imposing more than one penalty for an illegal discharge, bars the State's action for civil forfeitures because the State previously imposed a penalty by requiring Sadoff & Rudoy to clean up the pollution at considerable expense. We disagree with Sadoff &…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. R.W.S. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MautheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hake v. ZimmerleeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  4. State v. RollfinkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Enpro Assessment Corp. v. Enpro Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  2. Waukesha State Bank v. Village of WalesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  3. County of Langlade v. KasterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  4. State v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
  5. State v. Victory Fireworks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API