Legal Opinion

Kitras v. Town of Aquinnah

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 14, 2015No. AC 12-P-260PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

From the earliest time, the members of the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (now known as Aquinnah) in Martha’s Vineyard (Gay Head Tribe or Tribe) had a custom and practice of common access across the lands that are the subject of this appeal. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the ancient origins of that common access — dating back before the late eighteenth century — establish the equivalent of a chain of title, with access rights that would not yield landlocked parcels. The late nineteenth century State statutory conveyance of large tracts of public common land in Aquinnah, including…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Orpin v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. New York & New England Railroad v. Railroad CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. Davis v. SikesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Higbee v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  5. Kitras v. Town of AquinnahMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kitras v. Town of AquinnahMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  2. Decoulos v. Town of AquinnahDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API