Legal Opinion

Tobiczyk v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 6, 1974No. Civ. A. No. 39006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FEIKENS, District Judge.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding in which petitioner asks the court to set aside an involuntary activation order of the Department of the Army. This order activates petitioner under authority of 10 U.S.C. § 673a for unsatisfactory performance in the “ready reserve” of which he is a member. Specifically, the Army claims that Tobiczyk consistently missed drills and meetings of his reserve unit. Petitioner does not deny the fact of his absences, but contends that the activation order is illegal for several reasons. First, petitioner claims that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Schatten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. Robert S. Antonuk v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  4. Thomas Hector Bohnert v. Brig. Gen. James Faulkner and Stanley Resor, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  5. McSweeney v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HudsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  2. Febus Nevárez v. SchlesingerDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API