Legal Opinion

Hubbs v. Bancroft

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1853PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Jefferson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Bill in chancery by the defendants in error against the plaintiffs in error. The object of the suit was to subject a part of lot No. 61, in the city of Madison, to the payment of a judgment at law against Benjamin and Joseph Hubbs. Benjamin Hubbs, Charles W. Basnet and Charles Fox answered. The other defendants, viz., David H. While, Edward Warner and Joseph Warner, (who were partners under the name of David H. White & Co.) Samuel Bespham and James F. D. Lanier, were defaulted.

The facts are, substantially, as follows:

On the 6th of March, 1836, Basnet, by deed in fee, conveyed the lot in…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Milburn v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Pence v. CroanIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Lowry v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Wynne v. GlidewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Ball v. BarnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API