Legal Opinion

Wynne v. Glidewell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1861PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Franklin Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs, brought this action against Glidewell and Robeson for the recovery of personal property, alleged to have been by them unlawfully taken, and wrongfully detained. The record discloses these facts: Henry Shaffer, a failing debtor, on April 3, 1858, by deed of assignment, transferred to the plaintiff, in trust for the payment of debts, his real and personal property, embracing his tanyard and stock in trade connected therewith, consisting of leather, hides, tanned and untanned, implements for tanning and currying, and every other species of personal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kent v. LawsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Phœnix v. DeyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1809
  3. Alexander v. GouldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1804
  4. Hubbs v. BancroftIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Doe, on the Demise of Maxwell v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Garner v. GravesIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Robbins v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Stribling v. BrougherIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Campbell v. CoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Cox v. ViseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API