Legal Opinion
Fitzsimmons v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 15, 1942No. 30848PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
The decisive question in this case involves the law of collateral attack of judgments.
The plaintiff, George A. Fitzsimmons, sued to cancel a reassessment for street improvement refunding bonds against four lots in Oklahoma City belonging to him. The city and the present bondholders were made parties defendant. From a judgment in favor of the defendants, the plaintiff appeals.
The original paving bonds were issued Sept. 12, 1911. In 1919 the Legislature enacted a statute (ch. 200, S. L. 1919) authorizing an action by the bondholder, the property owner, and others to determine the amount of the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. OttersonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Continental Gin Co. v. De BordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Veiser v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Stidham v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. KellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.