Legal Opinion
Schneider v. Pullen
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 23, 1951No. [No. 161, October Term, 1950.]PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, C. J.
Appellant, individually, and trading as City Barber Schools, filed his bill of complaint in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City against the State Superintendent of Schools and the Maryland State Board of Education, asking for a declaration that Section 14(a) of Article 77, as amended by Chapter 489 of the Acts of 1947, is void and unconstitutional, and that proposed rules and regulations issued by the State Superintendent of Schools under this statute are invalid. He also asked for an injunction to restrain the defendants from enforcing any provisions of the act, and for further relief.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commissioners of Cambridge v. Eastern Shore Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Tighe v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Kracke v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Kahl v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Clauss v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Pressman v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Insurance Commissioner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Tanner v. McKeldinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- Poe v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- State Department of Assessments & Taxation v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.