Legal Opinion
Feinberg v. Saks & Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 20, 1982PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jasen, J.
Plaintiff, Doris Feinberg, brought this action for false arrest and malicious prosecution after having been acquitted of a charge of petit larceny. That criminal charge had been filed against her by security personnel of defendant Saks & Company. At trial, a general verdict was returned in Mrs. Feinberg’s favor on the cause of action for malicious prosecution, and in favor of defendants on the false arrest cause of action.
Although the defendants had not requested a charge that the jury’s finding on the false arrest cause of action *210should in any way affect their…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barry v. ManglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Martin v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Maguire v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
3Cited by33 opinions
- Brandon v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Curry v. City Of SyracuseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Hollender v. Trump Village Cooperative, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Curry v. City of SyracuseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Miloslavsky v. AES Engineering Society, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.