Legal Opinion

Hutto v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1919No. 10463Published

Accusation of bastardy; from city court of Hazlehurst—Judge Knox. August 13, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

A motion to dismiss the writ of error in this case was made upon the ground that “said bill of exceptions and the transcript of the record in said case was not transmitted to the Court of Appeals of Georgia within fifteen days from the date of the service of said bill of exceptions.” In his certificate to the transcript of the record the clerk of the city court of Hazlehurst says: “I further certify that the original bill of exceptions in this case was filed in my office on the 28th of August, 1918, as will appear by reference to said bill of exceptions. This record has not been transmitted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Budden v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Wheeler v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Lang v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Paschal v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Nobles v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API