People v. Thurmond
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial following his conviction of 20 counts of violation of section 288a of the Penal Code. The first nine counts charged related to acts alleged to have been committed by defendant on one Clarence, and the remaining 11 counts related to separate acts alleged to have been committed on one Donnie. It was stipulated that both Clarence and Donnie were accomplices.
It is defendant’s primary contention that there was not sufficient corroboration of the testimony of the two accomplices. He further contends that the testimony…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. WayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. TobiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. BoyceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- State v. ForbesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- People v. CantuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. GranadosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.