Legal Opinion

State v. Conti, No. Cr (Jan. 27, 1995)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 27, 1995No. CRUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM FILED JANUARY 27, 1995 The defendant moves the court to permit introduction of the favorable results of the defendant's polygraph examination. The defendant argues that although the Connecticut courts have consistently held that polygraph examinations are inadmissible, recent changes in the law with respect to the admissibility of expert testimony provide for the introduction of the polygraph evidence.

"The questionable accuracy of polygraph examinations is the most persuasive reason for excluding polygraph…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. People v. FudgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. FodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API