Legal Opinion
AmSouth Bank v. Mississippi Chemical Corp.
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided December 14, 2006No. 06-CIV-0722PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MARTEN, District Judge.
As a part of a plea agreement following a prosecution under the Migratory Bird Act, 16 U.S.C. § 703, 707(a), the defendant Mississippi Potash agreed to remediate environmental pollution at the Laguna To-stón site in New Mexico, and toward this end deposited $237,500 into escrow with plaintiff AmSouth Bank. Under the Remediation Escrow Agreement, AmSouth would pay funds from the escrow account upon confirmation by Mississippi Potash that the United States Probation Office either approved or did not object to the payment. After the dissolution of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Harry Kenneth Clark v. Library of CongressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Richard Pickus v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Simmat v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- A. Wallace Tashima, United States District Judge v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts L. Ralph Mecham, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Colon v. Strawberry (In re Strawberry)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 2012
- MATRAJT v. THE UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- PacNet Services Ltd. v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021