Legal Opinion

People v. Olague

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided February 21, 1973No. Crim. A. No. 11667PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*Supp. 7Opinion

HOLMES, J.

The orders of the municipal court sustaining respondent’s demurrer and dismissing the action raise only the question of whether the challenged statute is unconstitutional on its face. We address ourselves to that question only.

Section 270 of the Penal Code has been before the appellate courts many times. It is held to have important public objectives for the support of children (In re King (1970) 3 Cal.3d 226, 233 [90 Cal.Rptr. 15, 474 P.2d 983] cert. den. 403 U.S. 931 [29 L.Ed.2d 709, 91 S.Ct. 2249]). The means prescribed under this statute to further its legitimate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. People v. OlagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API