Legal Opinion

Schreiber v. Hoysgaard

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided June 8, 1989Published

1Opinion of the CourtSilva, J.

This purports to be a report by the Trial Judge, sua sponte pursuant to G.L. c. 231, § 108. We assume that the report’s reference to an appeal pursuant to G.L. c. 231, § 102C is in error as that section deals with cases remanded from the Superior Court. The Trial Judge, sitting in a small claims session, dismissed without prejudice the plaintiffs claim invoking the court’s jurisdiction under G.L. c. 223A, § 3, the so-called long-arm statute. Having dismissed the claim without prejudice to the plaintiffs right to bring a new civil action, the Trial Justice through this report seeks guidance as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Associates Discount Corp. v. GillineauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Caissie v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Daum v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Hayes v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Bougioukas v. MooreMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API