Legal Opinion
Hastings v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 3, 1996No. 95-1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
670 So.2d 1176 (1996)
Jeffrey R. HASTINGS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-1956.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 3, 1996.
Jeffrey R. Hastings, Indiantown, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order denying a pro se motion for post-conviction relief.
While the state makes a valid argument that the facts of this case as shown by trial testimony demonstrate that appellant's actions which resulted in six separate drownings may well be…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Wheeler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Cherry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Stanley Marsh & Sons, Inc. v. Niagara Distributors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
4Cited by7 opinions
- Hastings v. KrischerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Fernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Runge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Frank v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Vega v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.