Legal Opinion
Hastings v. Krischer
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 2, 2003No. 4D02-2426PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
840 So.2d 267 (2003)
Jeffrey R. HASTINGS, Petitioner,
v.
Hon. Barry KRISCHER, State Attorney, Respondent.
No. 4D02-2426.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
January 2, 2003.
Rehearing Denied April 7, 2003.
Jeffrey R. Hastings, Daytona Beach, pro se.
No response required for respondent.
2Per curiam
By order dated September 6, 2002, this court denied the pro se petition for writ of mandamus filed by Jeffrey R. Hastings (Petitioner). Petitioner sought to compel State Attorney Barry Krischer (Krischer) and the circuit court to "obey the law" concerning habitualization and to resentence him without…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- State v. CallawaySupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Raley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Hastings v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Baldwin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Nilio v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015