Legal Opinion
Demick v. City of Joliet
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 1, 2000No. 99 C 8192PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court is the City of Joliet’s motion to dismiss Counts III, IV and V of plaintiff Mary Lee Demick’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons that follow, the court denies defendant’s motion to dismiss.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Mary Lee Demick (“Demick”) has filed a five-count complaint against defendant City of Joliet (the “City”). Count III is a claim for violation of plaintiffs due process rights, alleging that the removal of Demick’s name from an eligibility list was a confiscation of her…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Greg and Mary Henson v. Csc Credit Services, Trans Union Corporation, and Cosco Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Craig S. Strauss v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, and Chicago Police Officer John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- John A. Reed, Gerald G. Kaluzny, and Rbk, Ltd. v. Village of ShorewoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moore U.S.A. Inc. v. Standard Register Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2001
- Demick v. City of JolietDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Demos v. City of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001