Legal Opinion
City of Forth Worth v. Bostick
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 7, 1972No. 17301PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BREWSTER, Justice.
In a non-jury trial the court granted the plaintiff, L. A. Bostick, a mandatory injunction against the City of Fort Worth requiring the City to allow Mr. Bostick to use all of his accumulated sick leave before retiring him involuntarily from his job as a city fireman on a disability pension and requiring the City to pay Mr. Bostick his salary as a fireman until such time as he had used all of his accumulated sick leave. The City has appealed from that decree.
The undisputed evidence showed the following: on December 3, 1970, Mr. Bostick became totally and permanently…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Horr v. CattaliniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Guerra De Chapa v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1954
- Price v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Turley v. John Hancock Mut. L. Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Galveston v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Unker v. Joseph Markovits, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Burns v. Harris County Bail Bond BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- City of Denison v. Odle, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Odle v. City of DenisonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.