Legal Opinion

James v. Alberts

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1999No. Docket 195751PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, P.J.

Plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant seeking damages for injuries plaintiff suffered while voluntarily helping defendant dig a trench. The trial court granted summary disposition for defendant on the ground that the volunteer doctrine barred plaintiffs claim. MCR 2.116(C)(10). Reluctantly, we reverse and remand in accordance with a binding precedent set by this Court.

In Ryder Truck Rental, Inc v Urbane, 228 Mich App 519; 579 NW2d 425 (1998), the plaintiff was injured by a rented track while voluntarily helping a friend move. The plaintiff sued both the friend and the track rental…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. O'Dess v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Diefenbach v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Pace v. GibsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc v. UrbaneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James v. AlbertsMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. James v. AlbertsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. James v. AlbertsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API