Legal Opinion

Pahnke v. Pahnke

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 10, 2014No. Nos. 12-387, 12-416 & 13-007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crawford, Supr. J.,

¶ 1. Specially Assigned. Father appeals from the modification of a foreign child support order. He argues that he was never properly served with the motion to modify child support, that the Vermont family division lacks person.1 and subject matter jurisdiction over him and this matter, and that the magistrate improperly ruled that mother did not owe him arrears for the period preceding the modification. We affirm in part, but remand for recalculation of mother’s child support arrearage.

¶ 2. Father and mother were divorced in Michigan in 1997. The Michigan decree awarded…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Adamson v. DodgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. Towne v. TowneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Poston v. PostonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re A.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. Dyke v. ScopettiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. Dyke v. ScopettiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. In re A.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. In the Matter of Penichet and CorroonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API