Legal Opinion

Woodmen Accident Co. v. District Court

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 14, 1935No. 42865PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKintzinger, J.

Two petitions based upon similar claims against the Woodmen Accident Company, and the Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association were filed in the district court of Marshall county on November 5, 1934. The same questions being involved in both cases, they were combined and tried together. The only service of the original notices was by an acceptance of service by the “deputy” insurance commissioner. The defendants filed a special appearance in both actions questioning the jurisdiction of the court for lack of proper service. The lower court sustained the service and denied the special…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Amy v. WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Chambers Bros. & Co. v. King Wrought-Iron Bridge ManufactorySupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Brain v. DeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Bennett v. Supreme Tent of the Knights of the Maccabees of the WorldWashington Supreme Court · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Hanrahan's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API