Legal Opinion
URS Holdings. v. John Ripley
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 25, 2022No. 2:17-cv-05398Unknown
1Opinion
Case 2:17-cv-05398-RSWL-AGR Document 417 Filed 02/25/22 Page 1 of 48 Page ID #:10295 'O' 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 2:17cv05398-RSWL-AGRx 12 AECOM ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC., ORDER re: 13 Plaintiff, 14 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS [398] v. 15 DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR 16 GARY TOPOLEWSKI, et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT [395, 396] 17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiff AECOM Energy & Construction, Inc. 19 (“AECOM”) brought this Action for injunctive relief and 20 damages against Defendants Morrison Knudsen Corporation; 21 Morrison-Knudsen Company,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.