Little v. Sturgis
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Fayette District Court.— HoN. L. E. Eellows, Judge. Action upon a promissory note. To the answer of the defendant a demurrer was interposed, and this was overruled. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
From the petition it appears that tbe note in suit was executed by tbe defendant to tbe Citizens’ Bank of Oelwein in June, 1895, and provides for tbe payment of $10 four'months after date; that in 1900 said bank made an assignment for tbe benefit of creditors; under tbe statute, to Jay Cook, and in February, 1900, tbe latter, as assignee, sold and delivered said note to tbe plaintiff. Tbe answer is in two counts. In tbe first tbe execution of tbe note sued upon is admitted, but defendant denies, upon information and belief, and demands proof of, tbe ownership of sucb note by plaintiff. In tbe…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McPhail & Co. v. HyattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Darr v. LilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- Sperry v. GallaherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stegal v. Union Bank & Federal Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- James v. Lederer-Strauss & Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Marshall Field & Co. v. ObelerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929