Legal Opinion

Neel v. Pennsylvania Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 11, 1895No. 188PublishedCited by 19 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR. THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OE OHIO. This action was brought in the Court of Common Pleas of Richland County, Ohio, and removed into the Circuit Court by the defendant. The petition for removal stated: “ First. The plaintiff was at the time of the commencement of this action and still is a resident of the State of Ohio, in the county of Richland. Second.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR. THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OE OHIO. This action was brought in the Court of Common Pleas of Richland County, Ohio, and removed into the Circuit Court by the defendant. The petition for removal stated: “ First. The plaintiff was at the time of the commencement of this action and still is a resident of the State of Ohio, in the county of Richland. Second. The Pennsylvania Company, the defendant herein, is a corporation duly incorporated under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, and was at the commencement of this action and…

1Opinion of the Court

The Chief Justice

stated the case, and said: On the authority of Grace v. American Central Insurance Co., 109 U. S. 278, 288, 284; Continental Insuramce Co. v. Rhoads, 119 U. S. 237; and Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway v. Swan, 111 U. S. 379, 388, the. judgment of the Circuit Court will be reversed, with instructions to remand the case to the state court with costó against defendant in error, which must also pay the costs in this court. Hamrick v. Hamrick, 153 U. S. 192, 198.

Judgment reversed accordingly.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Continental Insurance v. RhoadsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Hanrick v. HanrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. WillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Guarantee Co. of North America v. First National Bank of LynchburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  3. Congress of Racial Equality v. ClemmonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Ry. & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division No. 1127 v. Southern Bus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  5. Green v. HeastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API