Legal Opinion

Rollison v. Biggs

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 22, 1987No. Civ. A. 80-165 MMSPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

On April 2, 1987, this Court held that the local defendants 1 are not responsible for any portion of the attorneys’ fees to which plaintiffs in this action are entitled. Rollison v. Biggs, 656 F.Supp. 1204, 1211 (D.Del.1987) (“Rollison IF). Plaintiffs had asserted that they prevailed against the local defendants in administrative proceedings mandated by the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (“EAHCA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1401 et seq. They pointed out that the hearing officer presiding at their local due process hearing ordered a prospective change in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Crest Street Community Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Latino Project, Inc. v. City of Camden, Melvin Primas, and William HanowskyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Burpee v. Manchester School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Field v. Haddonfield Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  2. Robert D. v. SobelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  3. Duane M. v. Orleans Parish School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Counsel v. DowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Kristi W. Ex Rel. G. Russell W. v. Graham Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API