Legal Opinion
Middlesboro Liquor & Wine Co. v. Berkshire
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 28, 1942No. 8020PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
On July 14, 1937, following an investigation and hearing, a Wholesaler’s Basic Permit was issued to appellant, to engage in the business of selling wine and distilled spirits.1 On June 26, 1941, the permit was annulled, and the order of annulment was affirmed on August 16, 1941. This appeal followed.2
The validity of the challenged order depends upon the following statutory language : 3 “A basic permit shall by order of the Secretary of the Treasury, after due notice and opportunity for hearing to the permittee, * * * (3) be annulled if the Secretary finds that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. GinsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Arrow Distilleries, Inc. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Oklahoma-Texas Trust v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Knight v. Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pasadena Research Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- National Labor Relations Board v. Armstrong Tire and Rubber Company, Tire Test Fleet BranchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Marine Wholesale & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- In re Martin's Retail Liquor License No. 1517District Court, D. Alaska · 1954
- Levers v. BerkshireCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.