White Provision Co. v. City of Atlanta
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroxles, C. J.
1. Where a fi. fa. based on a sewer assessment is levied upon abutting property, “the fact that the abutting property, in its present condition, may not be specially benefited by construction of the sewer would not render the assessment illegal.” Neal v. Decatur, 142 Ga. 205 (2) (82 S. E. 546), and cit.
2. Where the construction of a sewerage system by a city is authorized, “the legislature determines expenditures and amounts to be raised for their payment, the whole discussion and all questions of prudence and propriety and justice being confided to its discretion. It may err, but the courts…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Town of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Neal v. Town of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- LaGrange Lumber & Supply Co. v. Gandy Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930