Legal Opinion

White Provision Co. v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 2, 1928No. 19041PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBroxles, C. J.

1. Where a fi. fa. based on a sewer assessment is levied upon abutting property, “the fact that the abutting property, in its present condition, may not be specially benefited by construction of the sewer would not render the assessment illegal.” Neal v. Decatur, 142 Ga. 205 (2) (82 S. E. 546), and cit.

2. Where the construction of a sewerage system by a city is authorized, “the legislature determines expenditures and amounts to be raised for their payment, the whole discussion and all questions of prudence and propriety and justice being confided to its discretion. It may err, but the courts…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Town of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Neal v. Town of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LaGrange Lumber & Supply Co. v. Gandy Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API