Legal Opinion

Going v. Going

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 19, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SENTER, »J.

To the end that the questions involved on this appeal may be more clearly understood, we deem it expedient to give a summary of the history of the litigation.

Mrs. Birdie M. Going obtained a decree for an absolute divorce from her husband, L. C. Going, and there was awarded to her by the court as alimony, $4000, which was paid to her in cash by Going, and the further sum of $1800 for her support and maintenance, and also $150 per month beginning August 1, 1920. The decree for ■alimony as above set forth was a consent decree. Considerable litigation between the parties resulted from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bool v. MixNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Buel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Cochran v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. State Ex Rel. Foot v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Wallace v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glover v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  2. Kamper v. WaldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Buchholtz v. BuchholtzTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Holman v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  5. Talley v. TalleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API