Legal Opinion

Holman v. Holman

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 5, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwepston, J.

This is an appeal by complainant, Mrs. Holman, from a decree dismissing her divorce bill for lack of jurisdiction.

The case was heard on oral testimony after personal service and a pro confesso against defendant. The bill of exceptions is narrative and in some respects meager.

The facts as best we can determine are as follows:

Complainant was domiciled from June 1949 in Tennessee before her marriage to defendant. Defendant was at all times herein domiciled in Missouri, but was in the Navy and stationed in San Diego, California, when they were married in Arizona October 9, 1949.. Immediately…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tyborowski v. TyborowskiCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  2. Fitzpatrick v. FitzpatrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Carter v. CarterTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Younger v. GianottiTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  5. McFerrin v. McFerrinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sprague v. BucherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  2. Talley v. TalleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
  3. Wiseman v. WisemanTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Bernardi v. BernardiCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  5. Murrell v. MurrellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API